Simply categorizing on-demand
workers as full-time employees is almost certainly too blunt an approach, and
wouldn’t accurately reflect how the government should regulate the
employer-employee relationship. For instance, a recent poll found that while most
on-demand workers (72 percent) believe companies should be doing more to
provide benefits, respondents were split on whether the government should regulate
the sector.[i] Forcing
businesses to treat all workers like full-time employees could severely impact
businesses as well. One estimate put the additional costs of awarding employee
benefits for Uber alone at $4.1 billion, an amount that could scuttle the
company.[ii] [YI1]
[i]
Ibid.
[ii] Stephen Gandel, “Uber-nomics: Here's
what it would cost Uber to pay its drivers as employees”, Fortune, September
17, 2015, http://fortune.com/2015/09/17/ubernomics/.
Greetings! Thanks for inviting me right here. i found such plenty of exciting thoughts here. Your writing style will be very smooth and that i truly enjoy to studying your posts. you have got published article with perfectly! I honestly think this internet site desires a good buy greater interest. Feel free to surf college paper writing service
ReplyDeleteThanks for post:
ReplyDeleteship gửi hàng tới Uzbekistan
ship đồ tới Tajikistan
ship hàng hóa sang SriLanka
chuyển phát tốc độ sang Srilanka
caycotacdunggi.info
tmall.com
taobao.com
hmmmm
ReplyDeleteinformative post! I really like and appreciate your work, thank you for sharing such a useful facts and information about categorization of employee benfits, keep updating the blog, hear i prefer some more information about jobs for your career hr jobs in hyderabad .
ReplyDelete