Sunday, September 11, 2016

on-demand workers

Simply categorizing on-demand workers as full-time employees is almost certainly too blunt an approach, and wouldn’t accurately reflect how the government should regulate the employer-employee relationship. For instance, a recent poll found that while most on-demand workers (72 percent) believe companies should be doing more to provide benefits, respondents were split on whether the government should regulate the sector.[i] Forcing businesses to treat all workers like full-time employees could severely impact businesses as well. One estimate put the additional costs of awarding employee benefits for Uber alone at $4.1 billion, an amount that could scuttle the company.[ii]  [YI1] 

[i] Ibid.
[ii] Stephen Gandel, “Uber-nomics: Here's what it would cost Uber to pay its drivers as employees”, Fortune, September 17, 2015,


  1. Greetings! Thanks for inviting me right here. i found such plenty of exciting thoughts here. Your writing style will be very smooth and that i truly enjoy to studying your posts. you have got published article with perfectly! I honestly think this internet site desires a good buy greater interest. Feel free to surf college paper writing service

  2. informative post! I really like and appreciate your work, thank you for sharing such a useful facts and information about categorization of employee benfits, keep updating the blog, hear i prefer some more information about jobs for your career hr jobs in hyderabad .

  3. Hi,
    i have read your blog
    really nice post
    thanks posting
    We are leading Laparoscope instruments distributor in delhi.

  4. Hi,
    Nice Post
    We are Leading Bluestar Dealer in Delhi, Contact Us For More info

  5. In any case, as a sole owner or accomplice of work at home business, you'll be liable to tax reductions, ข่าวบอลล่าสุด

  6. I found this post useful specially For best job. we provide sales recruitment agencies toronto online. for more info visit our website.